[identity profile] byslantedlight.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] ci5hq
There's something I've been wondering for a while, off and on, every time I read a fic that reminds me of it, and I'd love to hear what other people think about this. Can anyone tell me:

What is it about canon Doyle that has made fanfic writers portray him as:

a) incredibly selfish

b) incredibly tight with money

I'm really really curious - anyone got any ideas? Are there particular moments that stand out, where he behaves like that? Why do they stand out? Or is it some more general thing? How many people would agree with that portrayal?

It's not that I can't see what might make an author write Doyle like this, it's just that I can't see why he's so often portrayed that way. Whatcha think?

Date: 2007-11-17 05:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] paris7am.livejournal.com
Sneaking in the back of the discussion here...

So many excellent and thought provoking ideas stated in this thread! I don't know that I can add much to them except to mention a few things the discussion jogged in my memory.

This is just an aside, but could some of Doyle's characterization be a facade added on from the public persona of Martin Shaw? There was that bit of rumour that he was stopping re-runs of the show because of royalties? I think that several of these rumours imply that MS is -eek, what are the words?!- confident in himself and in looking out for his own best interests? A bit separate from the others? I don't know - it's not as though Lewis Collin's persona was clean, either - maybe we see slippage there too! I'm dabbling in gossip and innuendo, which feels wrong, but there does seem to be a bias against MS that comes up in the press every so often. I think that the slippage is easy to do - so much of what we love about the characters *seems* to be ad libbing, or spontaneous interaction, which makes us feel as though it's part of *them* as well as part of the characters.

And inane example, #29 - the time when Bodie sends flowers and Doyle sends the telegram. Not so much an example of thriftiness as an example of styles, perhaps? The idea (particularly in the first episodes) that comes across in their attire - of Bodie as flamboyant, extravagant, posh? (possibly trying to camouflage things?) while Doyle is workmanlike, casual, (gorgeous!), up front and more serious. But how did I get into interpretation of character through fashion choice? What next? patterns in spent bullet casings? lol...

I know that I will keep this question in mind when I watch and read, now.

Date: 2007-11-17 11:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shooting2kill.livejournal.com
Can we have a new page please, Miss?

Date: 2007-11-17 01:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jgraeme2007.livejournal.com
This is just an aside, but could some of Doyle's characterization be a facade added on from the public persona of Martin Shaw?

I think that's more than possible. That their real life characters occasionally overlap their onscreen personnas -- especially for UK writers (because here in the States LC & MS are not terribly well-known -- well, and neither is Pros!)

And inane example, #29 - the time when Bodie sends flowers and Doyle sends the telegram. Not so much an example of thriftiness as an example of styles, perhaps?

Yeah, I don't think Doyle is supposed to appear price-conscious. In the initial episodes especially there seems to be the running gag that he's not as smooth with the ladies as Bodie, that he's willing (daft enough?) to take Bodie's advice -- for example -- on how to win over the new agent practicing her kata.

What next? patterns in spent bullet casings? lol...

I like it!

Profile

ci5hq: (Default)
CI5 hq

December 2025

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 1213
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 2627
28293031   

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 25th, 2026 05:55 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios