A Doyle-thing to think about...
Nov. 15th, 2007 10:49 pmThere's something I've been wondering for a while, off and on, every time I read a fic that reminds me of it, and I'd love to hear what other people think about this. Can anyone tell me:
What is it about canon Doyle that has made fanfic writers portray him as:
a) incredibly selfish
b) incredibly tight with money
I'm really really curious - anyone got any ideas? Are there particular moments that stand out, where he behaves like that? Why do they stand out? Or is it some more general thing? How many people would agree with that portrayal?
It's not that I can't see what might make an author write Doyle like this, it's just that I can't see why he's so often portrayed that way. Whatcha think?
What is it about canon Doyle that has made fanfic writers portray him as:
a) incredibly selfish
b) incredibly tight with money
I'm really really curious - anyone got any ideas? Are there particular moments that stand out, where he behaves like that? Why do they stand out? Or is it some more general thing? How many people would agree with that portrayal?
It's not that I can't see what might make an author write Doyle like this, it's just that I can't see why he's so often portrayed that way. Whatcha think?
no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 08:51 pm (UTC)And yeah, in DiaG they do confront their mortality, but they're both still doing it implicitly rather than explicitly in alot of ways. We don't see Doyle's conscious thinking about his mortality, only that it must be in the back of his mind. And out loud Bodie says things like "He'll make it", and explains that his will is "the strongest" when Cowley wonders if it's strong enough to keep him alive. He doesn't sit and weep or talk about the possibility of Doyle's death - we see it in other things that he says, ways that he reacts and so on...
And I think that's one of the strengths of the show, and perhaps what has helped it endure in fandom - there is so much scope for interpretation and so on. If they did say everything nicely and clearly out loud, then what's left to play with? *g*
no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 09:02 pm (UTC)It's the fun of filling in all the blanks. And there are so many blanks.
In DiaG it isn't so much what we see -- because what we see is very little -- but the logical conclusions we draw from what we see. It's pretty obvious that Doyle wouldn't make an instant recovery, but since the show is followed by other episodes, we see that he did eventually recover -- that this was the intent of the show's creator. The fun comes in trying to imagine how those weeks of recovery were spent. And of course the variety of perspectives on a particular episode is always entertaining. Very interesting to see what writers seem to agree on, and where they differ. Someday I'd like to write an essay on DiaG fics.
But I digress.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 09:20 pm (UTC)It's the fun of filling in all the blanks. And there are so many blanks.
That's what I said! *g*
no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 09:49 pm (UTC)Yeah. One day. One day soon, I hope.
But I do enjoy the analysis side of it too, and for some reason DiaG really gets to me. I've become a collector of those stories.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-18 08:13 am (UTC)Analysing the stories/eps/fandom can be good fun (although I'm not always in the mood to go too deeply into things, and I really don't need people pointing out all the discrepancies/shortcomings of the eps, which rather spoils the fun of it, which is the whole point for me!), and yeah DiaG is one of my favourite eps too. It was the only one that I really remembered through the years, from having seen the series when it was originally screened, which is interesting. I remembered the general tone of the rest of the show (though the realisation of slash was new - what can I say, I was an innocent young lass!) but it was scenes from DiaG that came back to me and were familiar... It's definitely got something! *g*