The Reading Room
Mar. 10th, 2009 02:58 pmWhat with running around clearing up all the cups and saucers, the glasses and empty bottles, and putting the books back on the bookshelves, I’ve just got time to say thanks to
firlefanzine.
Thank you very much, firlefanzine, for your rec this week, and for doing such a fantastic job of hosting the discussion, and over two posts what’s more. And thanks also to everybody who made this such a lively and intense discussion.
And we have a fic for this coming Thursday.
Is anyone brave enough to offer a rec for this week?
The only condition is that the fic should be online, so everyone can get access to it. Slash (or gen) goes without saying, I hope, in this company.
To suggest a fic for Thursday, please comment to this post. The first rec received here will be it.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 04:09 pm (UTC)And I want to thank all who shared and shared and shared... :-)
It was sometimes really overwhelming!
I just have a wish. How about limiting the number of pages of the rec stories? Maybe not more than 100 pages, or better not more than 50?
Just because of RL...
(I can proudly announce that I've read the 680 pages of Waiting To Fall! - but it took some weeks...)
I'm looking forward!
no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 04:16 pm (UTC)If someone suggests something really long like WTF...maybe we could do two weeks instead of one for the reading? Or maybe we just cross that bridge when we come to it.
It was an excellent discussion, firlefanzine. I enjoyed it!
no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 04:46 pm (UTC)Most fun is when many people discuss at the same time. I'm not so lucky about that, because for example on Monday morning when all the Great Pros Watch entries are posted I have scarcely time for it.
Anyway it was just a thought. I would of course try even long stories like Labyrinth!
"It was an excellent discussion, firlefanzine. I enjoyed it!"
Thanks!
Excellent is the right description! Although I had sometimes problems to follow, for I'm no native speaker!
(I'm sure nobody noticed it... :-))
no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 06:15 pm (UTC)And I completely sympathise about Proswatch, on Monday morning I should be working, not checking The Safehouse (but I do anyway). I gather we have to do Proswatch on Sunday night because that is when it was originally shown on TV. Imagine the around-the-water-cooler conversations we could have had on Mondays after watching brand new Pros on TV. We'd need the cold water.
But that is why I want the Reading Room posts and discussion to start at the end of the week and run over the weekend when most of us have more time.
'for I'm no native speaker'. No, I didn't notice - extra respect!
no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 07:47 pm (UTC)If you go on saying such things I'm gonna go and write a fic - and you are to blame! :-)
Thanks!
no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 04:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 04:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 06:23 pm (UTC)I thought about limiting the word length when planning the Reading Room, but didn't want to impose too many conditions. I did sort of envisage the Reading Room fics as being something you could read in an hour or even less, like watching a Pros ep., partly so as not to interfere too much with RL, or become a chore and a burden.
I liked your idea, but was worried that if we take 2 weeks to read a long fic, the momentum would lapse. Now shooting2kill has made an excellent suggestion (if I understand correctly) of taking 2 or 3 weeks to read a long fic while keeping up with a short one each week as well.
At least these are ways to avoid having to be prescriptive about the length of fics to be recced.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 06:43 pm (UTC)Eeh - to be honest I'm far less likely to read two stories at once, with an eye to discussing them both... I'm a bit of a one-at-a-time girl when it comes to things I have to concentrate on! (Though weirdly I tend to have a few books on the go at once - not usually the same emotional pay-off, I don't think!)
I'm not sure that having an extra week to read would lose momentum, personally, not if it's just an occasional one-off - we'd all be away reading, after all!
Also, as of last week, I'll announce the fic as soon as it is recced, but ask for the discussion not to start until Thursday night, which allows a couple more days for reading.
Just to clarify what you said below... When you say "recced", you don't mean when the reccer has made their actual post, you mean when they've suggested it to you? So for example if someone volunteers one on a Tuesday, you'll tell us what it is, but ask them not to make their rec post before Thursday?
no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 07:57 pm (UTC)Yeah, I didn't mean this necessarily as a permanent, ongoing thing but *if* someone suggested a longish story then we could put it in our diaries kind of thing - keep it in mind - while in the meantime carry on with discussing the shorter stories.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 05:07 pm (UTC)But a longer fic gives us more to get our teeth into, and where would you draw the line between long enough and too long?
no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 05:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 06:07 pm (UTC)Taking longer to read a longer fic is a good idea, but I worry that if we 'miss' a week it will drag on and after a fortnight people will have moved on to something else.
Also, as of last week, I'll announce the fic as soon as it is recced, but ask for the discussion not to start until Thursday night, which allows a couple more days for reading.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 06:15 pm (UTC)I think I've probably misunderstood what you're saying but do you mean 'miss a week' in terms of the longer fic or in terms of discussing anything, because we'd still have the shorter, week-by-week, stories to keep us going.
Also, as of last week, I'll announce the fic as soon as it is recced, but ask for the discussion not to start until Thursday night, which allows a couple more days for reading.
I think that's a great idea and will give people slightly longer reading time. Thanks!
no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 06:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 06:27 pm (UTC)It's one I'd like read, certainly. Or was that a purely hypothetical comment?
no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 07:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 07:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 07:34 pm (UTC)Just a thought, though - it's your idea :-))
no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 07:44 pm (UTC)Just a thought, though - it's your idea :-))
I don't think anyone's recced a new one yet, have they? Shooting2Kill was speaking hypothetically it seems. *g*
So...did you have one in mind?
no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 07:53 pm (UTC)Hah! (I don't laugh out loud so I won't say LOL). Do you know, I used to think I'd like to try my hand at having a discussion club but the level of analysis of the stories here is so impressive to be almost daunting and I'm not sure I could 'host' it as well as it has been hosted.....I think it must be very hard thinking of new or worthwhile contributions to each comment. But the more one reads the stories and reads the analyses, the more one learns and the more ideas you get, so hopefully, in time, I *may* get the courage to rec something.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 08:13 pm (UTC)Please don't feel discouraged though, I'm sure you'd hold your own perfectly well.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 08:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 08:33 pm (UTC)Oh, I don't even know that it would be necessary that you respond to each comment -- unless you feared the discussion was flagging. I always enjoy your insights. You'd be great!
no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 10:31 pm (UTC)Really? Blimey....OK, in the meantime I'll try and get some practice.....
How do you get to Carnegie Hall?
Practice man, practice....
no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 07:54 pm (UTC)Okay, how about Lizzie's The Victorian Kitchen Gardener? It's on the circuit archive, here is the link: http://www.thecircuitarchive.com/tca/archive/6/thevictorian.html
no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 08:02 pm (UTC)Was thinking the timing was unfair to anyone who's not around lj on Tuesday afternoon GMT, but couldn't think of a better way of doing it for the moment.
Would you also be kind enough to do us a short rec and post it on or around Thursday evening? And host the discussion in comments to your post? If it's a problem, I'm happy to help (well, not so much happy, but prepared to...)
no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 08:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 08:15 pm (UTC)Thanks very much. This is going to be fun.
The Reading Room
Date: 2009-03-12 11:58 pm (UTC)to be followed by a poke in the ribs.
Re: The Reading Room
Date: 2009-03-13 01:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-11 02:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-12 02:46 pm (UTC)In the meantime, having someone else post a comment for you is an excellent idea.
Also, as the novelty wears off and more people (who are around on a Tuesday afternoon) have recced, the time before someone gets in with a rec will probably extend. This week it took about 5 hours for someone to 'volunteer'. *g*
no subject
Date: 2009-03-10 08:31 pm (UTC)Great choice!!