UK Paper Circuit Library - decision made!
Aug. 29th, 2020 07:16 pmIt's taken a wee while for the cogs to complete their turning (okay, over a year!), but you might remember that I unexpectedly became the current custodian of the UK Paper Circuit Library when the Three Guardians who inherited it from Sara needed to pass it on. I've been trying to decide since then the best thing to do with the 86 lever arch ring binders full of Pros stories, and it's been quite hard. My instincts are to save everything! because that's what historians do. Sort of. And once history is lost, then it's lost.
Except...
1) I've been intermittently working my way through some of the folders, and the vast majority of stories in them are either online somewhere or/and they're on ProsLib, saved for us all by the fab
hagsrus and colleagues.
2) Many of the stories are faded and hard to read (and scan) copies-of-copies-of-copies.
3) Many of the stories feel and/or smell slightly yuck, because their original life was in a smoker's house, back when that was considered okay, and I guess they've never been replaced. When I was borrowing stories from the library Way Back When (a dozen years ago or so) I remember buying disposable gloves for when I received an envelope of them, because the smokiness was so thick that my fingers smelled of cigarettes after handling the stories - it's faded alot now of course, but it's still there on alot of them. So they really all need replacing as documents anyway.
So... here's my plan:
1. I'm going to recycle any stories that are either online in an archive or on the ProsLib CD. That's 25/28 of the stories in File 1, for instance. If anyone would like me to send them any stories instead of recycling them (you might not have a printer, but like hard copies for instance) then I'm happy to do that for the cost of postage.
2. Obviously I will keep any stories that aren't available elsewhere (or have extra bits to them, like illustrations), and I will scan them to create electronic documents that can be printed out and shared in some way (I worked out that my printer does OCR after all!) I'm not going to put stories online without the author's permission, but I'll work out a way for people to find and access them - maybe printing them up into zines of some kind, or just sending them out to interested people, or something. If
hagsrus has author permissions to archive their stories, then I'll pass them on to her for including in ProsLib.
Now, because I don't consider them my sole possessions, because Pros stories were written for Pros readers to read, and so I think we should all have a say, here's a poll for clicking. Bear in mind that I'm moving house at the end of next month, and I'd rather move less stuff than more, so please fill it in soon if you have any interest in all this. Lack of responses will be taken as agreement by people who just don't care that much!
[Poll #2104520]
I am going to be wincing with every story I slide into the recycling box, but I finally decided that it was the sensible option.
On the other hand, I'm looking forward to sharing all the other stories with you! *g*
So - what do you reckon?!

Except...
1) I've been intermittently working my way through some of the folders, and the vast majority of stories in them are either online somewhere or/and they're on ProsLib, saved for us all by the fab
2) Many of the stories are faded and hard to read (and scan) copies-of-copies-of-copies.
3) Many of the stories feel and/or smell slightly yuck, because their original life was in a smoker's house, back when that was considered okay, and I guess they've never been replaced. When I was borrowing stories from the library Way Back When (a dozen years ago or so) I remember buying disposable gloves for when I received an envelope of them, because the smokiness was so thick that my fingers smelled of cigarettes after handling the stories - it's faded alot now of course, but it's still there on alot of them. So they really all need replacing as documents anyway.
So... here's my plan:
1. I'm going to recycle any stories that are either online in an archive or on the ProsLib CD. That's 25/28 of the stories in File 1, for instance. If anyone would like me to send them any stories instead of recycling them (you might not have a printer, but like hard copies for instance) then I'm happy to do that for the cost of postage.
2. Obviously I will keep any stories that aren't available elsewhere (or have extra bits to them, like illustrations), and I will scan them to create electronic documents that can be printed out and shared in some way (I worked out that my printer does OCR after all!) I'm not going to put stories online without the author's permission, but I'll work out a way for people to find and access them - maybe printing them up into zines of some kind, or just sending them out to interested people, or something. If
Now, because I don't consider them my sole possessions, because Pros stories were written for Pros readers to read, and so I think we should all have a say, here's a poll for clicking. Bear in mind that I'm moving house at the end of next month, and I'd rather move less stuff than more, so please fill it in soon if you have any interest in all this. Lack of responses will be taken as agreement by people who just don't care that much!
[Poll #2104520]
I am going to be wincing with every story I slide into the recycling box, but I finally decided that it was the sensible option.
On the other hand, I'm looking forward to sharing all the other stories with you! *g*
So - what do you reckon?!

no subject
Date: 2020-08-29 07:31 pm (UTC)Learn more about LiveJournal Ratings in FAQ (https://www.dreamwidth.org/support/faqbrowse?faqid=303).
no subject
Date: 2020-08-29 08:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-08-29 10:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-08-29 08:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-08-29 10:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-08-29 09:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-08-29 10:05 pm (UTC)I think you have access to what's in File 1... I haven't sorted that site out properly yet, so I haven't made an announcement or anything about it, but you found it anyway, and the stories in File 1 are listed there... *g*
no subject
Date: 2020-08-29 10:12 pm (UTC)And you're right, I found it. I'm quite good at finding things I want to know, aren't I? *g*
no subject
Date: 2020-08-29 10:14 pm (UTC)ETA - oh, and if you wear gloves anyway then yes, you might not think about it! Although the gloves might get more unclean....!
no subject
Date: 2020-08-29 10:19 pm (UTC)New entry in ci5hq - UK Paper Circuit Library
Date: 2020-08-29 09:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-08-29 10:10 pm (UTC)Thank you very much!
no subject
Date: 2020-08-29 10:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-08-29 10:58 pm (UTC)There is still so much bliss between these stinking sheets...
Be strong! :-)
no subject
Date: 2020-08-30 08:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-08-30 09:26 am (UTC)If you want to send me a list of the stories you have, I could take a look and see what matches, or not! *g*
no subject
Date: 2020-08-30 09:31 am (UTC)I will send you a list in the next few days but i'm pretty sure that these stories will be in your collection too as they were probably shared many times over, these have stayed in very good condition atleast.
no subject
Date: 2020-08-30 10:09 am (UTC)And you never know, there were so many stories that were zine- or paper-only, there are bound to be gems hidden in people's personal collections! *g*
no subject
Date: 2020-08-30 08:54 am (UTC)First, I think you do an amazing job here, and to have even *accepted* 86 ring binders is a huge burden in itself!
Second, whilst like you I don't like the idea of throwing away printed stuff - a bit like burning books - I think there is a key difference here. Unless the writers are sadly deceased, they would have had plenty of opportunity over the past 40+ years to get their stuff online in some way. And clearly they have in many cases, or someone kindly has, as in evidenced by your sift. You are brilliant for all our efforts so far, but I would say, don't continue to burden your life with this. You have done your bit. More than.
X
no subject
Date: 2020-08-30 09:23 am (UTC)You're right about so many of the stories being online - although even more are in ProsLib. The online thing is tricky - alot of writers have put their stories online, or agreed that ProsLib can archive them, but there are quite alot who haven't. Some, I have been told, didn't want their stories to ever go online. Some of those people clearly changed their mind, because their stories are now online! But some either still don't want to, or forgot about them because they were writing 40 years ago or so, or just couldn't be bothered and so never did, or... but I'm sure there are bound to be some gems there, still waiting to be read! *g* So if I can find those stories and help them stay alive for Pros fans old and new, then I'll be happy. *g*
no subject
Date: 2020-08-30 09:35 am (UTC);)
no subject
Date: 2020-08-31 11:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-08-30 11:57 am (UTC)P x
no subject
Date: 2020-08-31 11:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-08-30 09:24 am (UTC)I think it is exactly the 'yuckness' that make these things historical artefacts. There will come a time when no one will understand how the smell of cigarette smoke was a ubiquitous part of life - so ubiquitous that even non-smokers couldn't smell it. That the office ceilings in old pictures weren't actually painted yellow.
I was simply going to suggest speaking to the British Library/National Archives/Museum of some description who might be interested in preserving some of these texts. Or possibly organisations interested in preserving social history. It is the lot of female history to end up in the shredder; so much of the rich cultural heritage of the distaff half of the world is unofficial narrative.
no subject
Date: 2020-08-30 09:38 am (UTC)That's a really excellent point, and a great suggestion!
no subject
Date: 2020-08-30 10:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-08-30 10:05 am (UTC)What I ended up thinking about this aspect was that there will be enough of the non-online stories that they will be a more acceptable representation than the current bulk, should I eventually find a repository that would accept them. Although there's definitely an argument for preserving the physicality of the fanfiction, museums etc. struggle even now to store the vast amounts of historic and prehistoric artefacts that they have, and they end up being selective because they have to be. Like I said, I won't be recycling any story that is different in any way from the online version - but the vast majority I've come across are simply poorly-copied exact versions, in varying states of disrepair, and are unlikely to be valued by such a funded body. I'm still keeping half an eye out though, and there's alot of work that I have to do before anything will be moved into recycling, so there's still time for replies etc.
no subject
Date: 2020-08-31 07:55 pm (UTC)Or, since most of the zines would be slash zines, this could be interesting queerzinelibrary (https://www.queerzinelibrary.com/)
Or even this? Salford Zine Library (https://salfordzinelibrary.co.uk/library/)
no subject
Date: 2020-08-31 11:25 pm (UTC)I'll be keeping an eye on them as far as my own (much cleaner and fresher smelling!) zine collection goes, though... *g*
no subject
Date: 2020-09-01 07:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-09-01 02:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-08-30 10:50 am (UTC)I know that it really does go against the grain to dispose of some of the paper copies but if the stories are already preserved online then I think it's the only solution, particularly as I'm well aware that many of the paper copies are in a very poor state.
Good luck, and thanks so much for taking on such a massive task!
no subject
Date: 2020-08-31 11:27 pm (UTC)I have to say it is a pretty big task - but with the added bonus of being with our lads the whole time, so... *g*
no subject
Date: 2020-08-30 12:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-08-31 11:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-08-30 03:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-08-31 11:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-08-30 04:26 pm (UTC)Thanks again!
no subject
Date: 2020-08-31 11:35 pm (UTC)The baking soda-sunshine trick sounds great - if only I lived in California rather than England...! *vbg* (But really, I may well give that a go for individual stories, if they're too bad! Hopefully they've all faded enough that they're bearable now though!)
no subject
Date: 2020-08-30 05:14 pm (UTC)I think your idea is perfect - much as I hate to think of it being destroyed, there doesn't seem to be any real advantage trying to keep it all when probably most of it is available online. And the physical copies aren't going to get any sweeter as the years go by - they're probably going to rot and fade. So, yes, please, go for it!
Mostly I just wanted to say thank you for all the work and thought you're putting into this.
no subject
Date: 2020-08-31 11:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-08-31 08:42 am (UTC)Nothing to add but thank you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
no subject
Date: 2020-08-31 11:40 pm (UTC)Yes! That's what I'm thinking - it helps to know that other people see it that way too, because I really do hate to recycle stories away, and I keep being niggled by the niggle about it.... But it's really not pleasant to handle some of these stories, and so if they're available cleaner and fresher for people elsewhere, then it really makes sense...
I can't help but remember the first time I saw the Paper Circuit Library though, when I went to visit Sara - it was amazing, laid out on her shelves as it was...
no subject
Date: 2020-09-01 04:19 am (UTC)I can only mirror the thoughts above, about storage practicality and preservation for the ages. It's good to know these words have not been lost.
no subject
Date: 2020-09-01 02:40 pm (UTC)And you're not at all late commenting, by the way - this isn't something I want to rush over too much, so I'm definitely giving it a few days to hear what people think before starting to hit the recycling bins!
no subject
Date: 2020-09-02 05:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-09-02 05:48 pm (UTC)That is a fine thing that you are doing, there. :-)