[identity profile] moonlightmead.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] ci5hq
Title: Hombathlay
Author: Jane Mailander
Pairing: sort of B/D. Only, well...
Available: First published in Second Variations On The Theme of B and D. On the CD and on the online Circuit Archive

Bunnies. Bunny rabbits and Pros. If you're asked for the connection between the two, I imagine that most people would say "That bit in No Stone with the cute rabbit", and quite a lot may add "And, of course, they're at it like rabbits, too."

But never, I bet you, thinking that somewhere in the rabbit world of Watership Down, there might be a Bodie rabbit and a Doyle rabbit.


I found the previous reading room stories difficult because I had no idea about the other worlds they were crossed over with. I initially found this one difficult because I knew the other world. In fact, the first time I saw it, I gave up early on. Since then, though, I have come to enjoy it rather more.

We dive straight into the rabbits' world, and the events in a new warren founded from the remnants of two others. The rabbits from Sandleford had escaped the destruction of their warren and founded a new one; this was then threatened by Efrafa. The rabbits of Efrafa lived under a harsh regime until their despotic leader was killed. Some Efrafan rabbits joined the new warren. It's worth pointing out for people who never read Watership Down that these rabbits fight and can kill each other, and that the author himself never saw it as a children's book. This is not at all Peter Rabbit or The Bunny-Fluffs' Moving Day.

Burdock is the main protagonist, and he's drawn as a big strong solitary rabbit, a veteran of the Efrafan warren's Owslafa (a group of large and bruising rabbits who enforce the rules) who likes stories about fighting and females. He's a bit too dangerous for the new peaceful warren and has few friends. Hombathlay is a new arrival at the warren, with many injuries and scars. He's small, with reddish fur. He's short-tempered and prone to lashing out, and snubs other rabbits' attempts to talk to him.

A lot of the first part of the story is really explaining the background world and back story. And then, about a third of the way in, Holly, an ex-Sandleford rabbit, insults Burdock for past sins in Efrafa, calling him a lendri (a badger, a predator on rabbits rather than a rabbit). And Hombathlay, who is present at the time, goes for Holly at this point, attacking him. And then shows interest in something for the first time.

"Did you tear that rabbit's ears?" Hombathlay asked. He looked straight at Burdock. His half-bitten face was ugly and lopsided, but both eyes were clear and dark.

"Yes. I was ordered to rip Blackavar's ears, and I did. The way the ferret ripped your ears."

There was a long silence. "Then I am not alone," Hombathlay said. "These rabbits are too stupid and peaceful. They will never understand what the taste of blood does to you. You do."

And the two outsider rabbits begin to bond. Sent on a task together, they learn more about each other and their past history. They engage in some mutual grooming, but when Burdock tries to mount Hombathlay in the fashion of Efrafan rabbits, it turns into a fight for dominance before Hombathlay undergoes a sort of fit in which he re-lives the encounter with a ferret that caused his injuries and goes into a lifeless trance. Burdock thinks he's caused it, and realises from his horror at the idea that he has lost Hombathlay that there is now another rabbit he cares about.

There's a mystical element in the plot: rabbits accept the existence of visions and seers, and consider the legend of the Black Rabbit, the representative of death, more than just a tale. Hombathlay turns out to have visions. One had led him to Burdock's warren, but another had told him he was too late. Burdock refuses to accept this latter vision:

Hombathlay looked up from the ground.

Burdock cuffed the smaller buck in a rough friendly manner. "Who else but another Enemy would put up with you?" He lay down to chew his grass-pellets.

And peace filled Burdock as the smaller body lay down beside him, warm and hard and friendly.

And the tale draws to an end.

The first time I read this story, it was on my initial plunge through the Circuit Archive online. I can't remember whether I found it via the random button or whether I knew from the Hatstand story lists what it was, but I do remember that I thought "What the bloody hell?" when I saw the note at the top about Watership Down, and skipped. I wasn't here for rabbits. Nor for fantasy, or scifi, or historical AUs, or anything that wasn't immediately Bodie and Doyle in London.

It took me a long time to give it another go. And by the time I did, I was more familiar with Jane Mailander's Pros stories. Of which there are heaps. And she really likes crossing Pros with other worlds or styles. There's a Beau and the Beast. There's The Little Merman. There's the Quanta Leap stories. There's a brilliant crossover with The Crying Game. There's Permanent Change (inspired by Alexander Pope's The Rape of the Lock). And so on. And it's not just Pros. I bought some multi-media zines for their Pros content (and idle curiosity) and found she was in those, too, crossing such varied worlds as Wiseguy with Beauty and the Beast, creating a story that engaged me totally despite never having watched either. So by the time I had another look at Hombathlay, I was a bit more prepared.

It's listed as a crossover, and I wondered about that, because to me a crossover is what happens when Bodie and Doyle encounter characters from another story. And we don't have Bodie and Doyle. We have rabbits. A big soldier-like rabbit with a dubious past, and a reddish rabbit with a dodgy cheekbone nicknamed 'sunshine', sure, but rabbits. But then, all the other characters are rabbits too, and I think that almost the other rabbits named are in fact characters in Watership Down. (There is one exception: a rabbit named not after a plant but after a bird. Nuthatch. Is it just me, or...?) So I suppose it is a crossover. A very very AU crossover.

It's much much more Watership Down than it is Pros. I'm really not sure that it is Pros. But it is full of echoes of the book. Not just the backstory or the names of the other rabbits. There's all the rabbit words, for a start: owsla, hraka, silflay, embleer. And some new ones the author coins by using the root words in the book, coming up with the compounds "Hombathlay" - "fox fur", so russet, presumably a nod to Doyle's hair in some lights and "Frithle" - "sunshine". Very clever. There are other phrases which I think she coins, but they are so apt for Watership Down that I am not sure ("bluebottle-gazing", "only good for the owls").

"Ferrets aren't dangerous!" and "Owls aren't dangerous" are a direct nod to Woundwort and his "Dogs aren't dangerous! Come back and fight!" in the book. The beetle crawling over the motionless Hombathlay's leg reminds me of something and I can't think what - maybe the fly on Bigwig's ear when he's in the snare. The comparison of Hombathlay's lost ear and whiskers with "the way the Black Rabbit took El-ahrairah's" is a reference to a story told in Watership Down. There's plenty more.

So when I look at this as a Pros story, I have trouble. When I look at it as a Watership Down story inspired by Pros, it seems to make a lot more sense, and on that level I like it a lot and think it's well-done. And I have to admit, I don't think I would have said that six months ago. It's really since standing back a little and reading one of her stories which was nothing to do with Pros that I thought "Wow, she can really tell a story, I want to know what happens next" and looked again at this one, and realised how deftly it was done.

A few other bits and pieces struck me, but it's your turn now.

Did you know Watership Down before reading (or trying to read) this? I'm really curious about how it comes across to someone who didn't already know the book. (I'm quite curious about what would happen if you gave it to someone familiar with Watership Down but not Pros, too, but not inclined to try!) Did you have to jump forward and back to and from the glossary, and did this affect your enjoyment?

Did you enjoy it? As a story generally, or as a Pros story?

I think normally I might ask whether the characters convinced you, or whether you could or couldn't see Bodie and Doyle in them, but... well... they're rabbits. Watership Down rabbits do have character and fairly complicated emotions, even if they can't count beyond four, but asking me to see Bodie and Doyle themselves in them is a bit too much. Although I can see that they might be like Bodie and Doyle. But that's just me. And I am pretty mono-fandom. I wonder if the people who read more widely across fandoms enjoy this more than the people who only read Pros. How about you?

Date: 2012-05-10 09:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] firlefanzine.livejournal.com
Oh dear! That's really not my cup of tea! :-O

"I found the previous reading room stories difficult because I had no idea about the other worlds they were crossed over with."
That's interesting. I don't know Judge John Deed either, but I had no problems to follow the crossover. I googled some information, some pictures. And if you know one Judge series - you know them all. ;-)

But I find it impossible to enjoy a crossover that needs so much information in advance.

"We dive straight into the rabbits' world, and the events in a new warren founded from the remnants of two others. The rabbits from Sandleford had escaped the destruction of their warren and founded a new one; this was then threatened by Efrafa. The rabbits of Efrafa lived under a harsh regime until their despotic leader was killed. Some Efrafan rabbits joined the new warren.....
...A lot of the first part of the story is really explaining the background world and back story. "


So you have to be ready to take an interest in the background world!
But what do I care? Really! I don't know WD, and I don't like to dive into a fantasy world, full of wars and fights and betrayal (and I don't like Harry Potter, Narnia or LOTR as well).

"It's much much more Watership Down than it is Pros. I'm really not sure that it is Pros. But it is full of echoes of the book."
I'm very much mono-fandom. But I love crossovers! It's jus that Bodie and Doyle really should be recognisable and they should be in the focus.

"Not just the backstory or the names of the other rabbits. There's all the rabbit words, for a start: owsla, hraka, silflay, embleer. And some new ones the author coins by using the root words in the book, coming up with the compounds "Hombathlay" - "fox fur", so russet, presumably a nod to Doyle's hair in some lights and "Frithle" - "sunshine". Very clever."
Yeah, well... I really don't need something like that!

No! You really did your best! And I tried(a bit... ;-)).
But... No!

Sometimes you enjoy the rec much more than the story!
Thank you!

Date: 2012-05-10 11:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] moth2fic.livejournal.com
I'm a fan of Watership Down (the book more than the film) as well as of Pros, and as you all probably know, I'm very multi-fandom in my reading choices though I've never read fic centred on WD till now! However, I had problems with this story. It was very clever, as you point out, in the choice of language, and the names made up from WD roots such as Hombathlay. But I didn't really see Burdock and Hombathlay either as likely WD rabbits or as the lads. Similarly I couldn't quite see Cowley in Cowslip. So whilst it was quite a clever story, it didn't work as fanfic or as a crossover for me. I saw it as a sort of experiment. As such it had to explain the WD world in a lot of detail, to make any kind of sense, and yet it didn't give big enough roles to the characters from WD that are loved by fans. The explanations were too condensed and too rapid so even a WD fan could get confused and I certainly missed the gradual unfolding that is one of the joys of WD. The violence and danger associated with the two protagonists made them at times seem more like the terrorists in Pros than like our lads. Yes, they were sent out to look for a place for the general good of the rabbits, but they were sent because they were too dangerous and antisocial to stay. I couldn't see the lads in that characterisation. The sexual element, too, was possibly true for rabbits but didn't fit with the lads as I see them; the switch from fighting for dominance to gentle friendship was too fast. The whole story was too short and the plot too minimal to do justice to either world. It was, for me, as if the writer was wrenching the characters of Bodie and Doyle and the generic WD rabbits in order to create an unusual story. She succeeded in creating something odd and mildly interesting but I wouldn't read it again.

However, I'm glad of the rec and the review and will be interested to see how others feel!

Date: 2012-05-10 12:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] golden-bastet.livejournal.com
I don't know Watership Down.

The first time I read it (completely blind, didn't look at any side info), I did not like it. I was almost completely wrapped up in looking for the Pros bits, and wondering what was going on, and sorting through the action ("was this supernatural?" "was that something the author added?").

After I hit the glossary, and knew who corresponded to what, I started to get drawn in on the second reading.

And the third time I read it, I really began to like it. I actually do think this is more brilliant than I could catch at first.

I definitely do see it as a crossover, but more WD/Pros than Pros/WD; not all crossovers are 50-50 balanced, after all, and there's nothing dictating that Pros has to be the driving force. (Given that I've read a different Pros crossover that seems flat because the story revolves around characters that I have no knowledge of and are never fully explained, I actually think this one is doing very well.) But that's one of the hazards of crossovers - or, really, fics in general: how well do they actually work for someone who doesn't have knowledge of the original?

Maybe another way of looking at it: the "problem" may not be about Pros content in particular; w/no knowledge of either story, would this be completely confusing, or would it be a very quirky AU requiring a lot of patience?

Date: 2012-05-10 12:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] byslantedlight.livejournal.com
*points to icon and giggles a bit*

Your reviewing this story means that I finally persevered to read it all through. I've tried a few times before, but just couldn't get into it - and to be honest I would have been perfectly happy to put it down this time too, but... I didn't... *g*

It's much much more Watership Down than it is Pros. I'm really not sure that it is Pros.
This is exactly what I thought when I'd finally reached the end - that it's really a WD/Pros crossover, rather than a Pros/WD crossover. I think the focus was very much on fitting our lads into the WD universe, and because the weight of my interest will always be in favour of B/D it just didn't hold enough of my attention. Our lads were sort of superficially our lads - you did a good job of summarising that, by the way! - but not enough to keep me interested. And it was so long ago that I read and re-read Watership Down that I didn't have enough sympathy for those characters to keep me going either...

Actually I am glad I kept reading this time, because Burdock/Hombothlay at the end are much more B/D than they seem at the start. The majority of the story is sort of setting up this ending - we almost miss out having a middle of the story, in fact - and it's almost as if Mailander is just settling into their characters as B/D when she finishes it. I suspect they might have become even more themselves if we'd followed them through their Wide Patrol - and I like to think that they might have met an old, red-furred rabbit around whom they were able to centre their new burrow, Hombothlay's vision having a bit more meaning after all!

I think Mailander's a good writer, though I'm rarely interested in what she writes about. I loved Permanent Change, and The Little Merman, but most of her other stories leave me rather colder, somehow - I think she's focussed more on her writing than she's in love with Bodie and Doyle, and that shows. Which is fine if you just want a story, but if you're looking for B/D... *g*

Did you know Watership Down before reading (or trying to read) this? I'm really curious about how it comes across to someone who didn't already know the book.
Well I did, but I've forgotten so much of it that Hombothlay seemed rather convoluted to me. I tend to read strange words in a story through context, rather than interupt the story, and look them up afterwards if I still need to, but there was an awful lot packed into this and I thought it made for rather uncomfortable reading, whereas what I prefer to do is curl up somewhere cosily and vanish from the world for a while... *g*

Date: 2012-05-10 03:17 pm (UTC)
murphybabe: (Default)
From: [personal profile] murphybabe
Oh, I'm sorry - I HATED IT!!! I read WD when it first came out and was fascinated. I've tried to go back to it later but never really succeeded. I've always been comfortable knowing I've read it and that it was interesting and clever.

This just didn't have enough B&D for me. I skimmed over the WD words (and didn't even realised Mailander had created some of her own words) and skimmed and didn't quite give up, but... I love some of her other writing, such as Permanent Change, which has to figure as one of my all-time favourite Pros stories, but I just couldn't get into this. It's too much like an exercise in writing rather than a story that engages me. Sorry to be so shallow!

Date: 2012-05-10 04:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] heliophile-oxon.livejournal.com
Drive-by (damn, this is getting to be a habit - Reading Room seems to coincide with far too many deadlines! And besides, it's my last chance to drive the Capri!!!!) just to say I agree with much that has been said in the comments above. I'm vaguely familiar with WD - can't remember if I ever even read all of it, it's rather long ago - but not particularly interested in it. Every time I see this story I think, oh yes it's that rabbit one - nope. And skip to a different page.

Having now read it, my main impression is that there was nothing like enough of B&D in this - their personality, relationships, sense of self, just not really there or only glossed over. It's all about the world of WD, the society, the history ... so I suppose I'm with those who see this as an exercise, an oddity, something that might be of interest to WD fans. Not My Cup of Tea *g*

Thanks for a good and interesting review, m-m!

Date: 2012-05-10 06:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sc-fossil.livejournal.com
Thanks so much for taking the time to review this fic. It's not my cuppa. I couldn't get past the first page. Sorry. JM is a good writer overall but I'm not big on bunnies, teddy bears, cats, etc. for the lads. I want the lads when I want the lads. :) It's not just this particular story for me, but any sort of animals as people as a trope. I'll pass those by and after twelve years in fandom, I haven't found one that I liked. Now a pure crackfic that's outrageous is something else entirely.

Date: 2012-05-10 06:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anna060957.livejournal.com
If murphybabe is shallow that makes me superficial, trivial, petty and small-minded. Sorry, but I couldn’t read this. I skimmed through the entire story have been totally put off by the suggestion that there could be a crossover with Watership Down. Reading (three times) the final “happy ending” was enough to cause me to give up the effort. I did read the book when it first came out (I think – mid-70s – I remember sitting on a train coming home from my first live-in job which would fit with my timeline?), but only have a vague recollection of the overall story, other than Hazel who I named my own rabbit after (as an adult owner). For me, there is too much good Pros fiction that I have yet to read, to spend time trying to learn another language.

Great rec, though, and thank you for taking the time!

Date: 2012-05-11 12:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] merentha13.livejournal.com
Put me in the shallow, superficial, trivial, petty and small-minded group. I couldn't finish this. The story just didn't work for me. I'm not an AU fan, but I think I would take B&D as elves before I can get past them being rabbits. :-(

I'm not familiar with WD - maybe that would have helped (although I did read a bit about it at various internet sites.)

You win kudos for taking this on. You had to know that it wasn't going to be a popular choice! Good rec! Thanks.

Date: 2012-05-11 04:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] margaret-r.livejournal.com
I loved Watership Down when I read it many years ago but I think it’s a very much a case of individual taste as to whether that novel appeals or even works for a lot of people. Combine that with making it a cross over with Pros and I do think there is a problem.

I couldn’t see this story as Pros or the lads at all and while a lot of the story is taken up with Watership Down history there still probably wasn’t enough detail to really give a non-reader the opportunity of understanding the original novel. In fact the backstory only really succeeded in making the fic itself overly long with not a lot actually happening. The concept itself was unusual and I admire the writer for attempting it but for me it didn’t work.

Thanks for the great rec, you made me think twice about the fic, even though the second thought didn’t make me like it any better than the first:)

Date: 2012-05-11 09:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] firlefanzine.livejournal.com
"...and while I can't think of an instance of betrayal,... "
You see, if I dislike something, I tend to put all bad things into it I know... ;-)

Look at the icon. Aren't they cute the way they are? Even without long ears and a mop tail?

Though... ;-)


Ok, ok. I know WD is not a story about 'cute' rabbits. I can understand it if the author had used the rabbits to 'illuminate' children. But I can't understand why I - as a grown up - should do without the millions of 'means of expression' of the human face and body?

Date: 2012-05-11 10:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] byslantedlight.livejournal.com
Agreed, but the ones we particularly like are totally different. I will make a guess that you really don't care for Landbridge, because that isn't B/D, for example. The one I really liked was One Who Has Made A Long Journey. That is so tightly woven up with The Crying Game that I really didn't think I could untangle it all in time to write a review! And I'm still amazed about that non-Pros one in Concupiscence, which I would never have thought would be my thing at all.
I wonder if this might all go to the heart of our differences - I think, from various things you've said over the past months, that you read Pros and fanfic just as reading, whether fiction or in a kind of academic out of interest kind of way. So you love Pros (I assume! *g*) especially, but you're equally as interested in everything else that's out there.

I realise that I tend to read all of fandom from a Pros-centric view though, and somewhere in my head there's (unfairly, I think) a wee dividing line that says This is fandom so it's a different thing to "normal" writing and This is a book/story/whatever that's part of the wider world and therefore interesting for what it shows me about that. So when I want to read in the wider world, I don't go for fanfic or its close relations - and when I want to read fanfic I want to read about B/D, because that's why I read fanfic... Which is really unfair to those writers who are at least as good as "professional" "wider world" authors, because there's been many a time I've taken something fabulous about the world away from B/D stories - but when a fandom story isn't B/D it's as if there's something missing for me - and I know it's going to be missing, so I rarely venture out to read them...

So... I think that's the problem with Hombothlay - I can appreciate that it's a good story in itself, and I do like the plot actually, but... it's fanfic, and there's not enough B/D in it for me and so... it's lacking. Which, as I said, is very unfair of me... I wonder if it's vaguely similar for other people though - that if you go into something thinking This is a B/D story then if it turns out not to tell you very much about them after all, it's disappointing...

Date: 2012-05-11 10:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] moth2fic.livejournal.com
It's possible that a longer story would have given a better impression of WD and the rabbit society. And possibly a longer 'wide' patrol looking for a place to stay would have given us rabbits with more facets of the lads' personalities. But I'm not convinced I would have read a longer story.*g* I like rabbits (and the nature/fantasy world of WD) and I like Pros. I'm not at all sure they should be mixed, long or short. I love crossovers and fusions even when I'm not familiar with the 'other' world. But I like them best where the two worlds seem at first glance to have something in common which the author then teases out at length. So, for example, Pros/S&H makes sense and there's the excitement of the crossover stories plus the underlying exploration of the similarities and differences. That applied to last week's Pros/UNCLE stories, too, and to things like The Wicker Man fusion. There is an initial glimpse of possible intertwining and then the stories work or don't depending on the skill of the author. I don't personally see any points of natural comparison between Pros and WD so I think I'd find the whole process of crossover or fusion artificial however long it was. I'm not saying all crossovers etc. have to have e.g. law enforcement elements (I enjoyed the Jane Eyre fusion) but for me they do need some integral aspect (centred on the characters or society portrayed) that allows me to wonder 'what if?' and to be interested in seeing how the author answers that question. I could go on at length but that would mean giving examples from lots of other fandoms and would lead us far from Pros into the realms of general fanfic meta.

Date: 2012-05-11 10:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] byslantedlight.livejournal.com
I don't seem them as rabbits here. I see rabbits with some sort of Bodie-ness and Doyle-ness.
Whereas I want to see them as Bodie and Doyle as rabbits... (or Bodie and Doyle as elves) - which is subtlely different, I think, to rabbits as Bodie and Doyle, to do with the focus of the story, again... I wonder if that's what the near-unanimity is about, that this seems more rabbits-as than B/D-as-rabbits?

And of course, some people then don't like B/D as anything except B/D - but interestingly, I can go there, as long as it's B/D to start with for me - and what makes them B/D is something I don't think we got to the bottom of, in [livejournal.com profile] goldenbastet's characterisation post, either... Maybe we should venture out to those waters again, and see... *g*

(And of course I hope you've read Arduinna Finn's Bodie-as-an-ef story... *g*)

Date: 2012-05-11 11:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] byslantedlight.livejournal.com
No? *awaits with interest*

Date: 2012-05-11 08:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anna060957.livejournal.com
Still with my shallow hat on ... I have an appalling habit of reading the last page of books - I know, it's REALLY bad! The ending I read was about the last three lines - didn't make sense the first time, second or third and last other than no one was dead!

I did enjoy Watership Down despite my country upbringing which puts rabbits firmly in the "vermin" pile (or alternatively the pot!) sorry, hope that didn't offend anyone. The idea of the lads being actual rabbits just doesn't work for me and I fear never will. Geneally I do like AUs and I've enjoyed reading the previous crossovers in this particular set - it's the rabbits! Sorry!

At the moment, there's just too many stories out there that I haven't yet read, many by tried, tested and loved authors, to spend my limited reading time on anything which I am not enjoying.

Objectively, a tough assignment and, from what you and others have said, very well done - just not my cup of tea.

But, again, thank you for your time.

Date: 2012-05-12 04:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] margaret-r.livejournal.com
Trying to see rabbits with B and D aspects, though, that worked for me.

Yes, there were similar characteristics - there had to be otherwise it wouldn’t be related to B and D at all! And it works for me on that level but it’s a bit of a reach.

and quite how complicated Watership Down is!

Watership Down is very complex and for people to understand it they have to read it and fall into the world – literally … like falling down a rabbit hole*g*. And maybe that’s part of the reason the fic didn’t work for me, perhaps I’m too invested in the novel to be able to stretch to a Pros crossover. I must say it was an interesting read though;)

Date: 2012-05-14 10:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hutchynstarsk.livejournal.com
I don't ever want to bash anyone's story, and I applaud the author for trying something difficult.

I read this story because it was recommended to me when I was curious about animal stories. The recommender described it carefully (so I could decide whether to read it or not), and personally liked it a lot.

I read it, and it drew me along, but it didn't feel like Pros to me. However, it made me want to re-read Watership Down (and the sequel with short stories). I did, and found it as always, very satisfying, so I'm grateful to the story for that!

Date: 2012-05-19 12:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hutchynstarsk.livejournal.com
Mm, if you run across the links for those stories I'd love to read them! :D Of course I may have *already* read them and forgot.... :)

*nodnod* That's the sequel I meant. :) I also love Plague Dogs (though it always makes me weep). I'd love to see the lads as escaped laboratory dogs or something like that. :D

(I do love AUs and crack!fic even if not all of it works for me.)

Date: 2012-05-28 06:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hutchynstarsk.livejournal.com
Oh, thank you! :) Well, I can't have already read it if it's in a zine... Thanks for the information!

Date: 2012-07-06 12:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] golden-bastet.livejournal.com
BTW, I was skimming through this today... and yep, I will get back to that characterization post at some point. :D

As Far As Is Appropriate by Jane Mailander (PG)

Date: 2012-11-06 01:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] livejournal.livejournal.com
User [livejournal.com profile] golden_bastet referenced to your post from As Far As Is Appropriate by Jane Mailander (PG) (http://crack-van.livejournal.com/5866116.html) saying: [...] Jane Mailander, author of the somewhat controversial Pros/ Watership Down crossover Hombathlay [...]

Profile

ci5hq: (Default)
CI5 hq

December 2025

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 1213
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 2627
28293031   

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 24th, 2026 08:08 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios