ext_19925 (
byslantedlight.livejournal.com) wrote in
ci5hq2010-05-27 08:30 am
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
Prosfic Spoilers - up for discussion again - with a shiny new idea...
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
What about setting up a Pros comm dedicated to spoilers for Prosfic? Prosficspoilers could be a place where anyone could go and find the spoiler information they needed. People who don't want spoiler information simply wouldn't go there! It could be used from CI5hq or any other comm, and even by people reading stories on the Circuit Archive, Hatstand, ProsLib or anywhere else that they worried didn't give them enough spoiler information.
People/contributors would simply post their spoiler information at the comm however they want to, and then tag the entry with the title of the story. The tags list would then show a long list of stories with spoiler information and simply clicking the title would bring that information up.
It would keep headers/trailers at all the Pros comms who wanted to use them nice and simple (no worrying about how to do coding of any kind):
Title:
Author:
Pairing: (the one piece of extra information that all but 2/c100 people polled said they wanted - and those 2 people didn't even care what fandom they were reading in *g*)
Story Information: Prosficspoilers [comm link]
And it could be used for new fic as well as reviews/recs, and also for stories where the authors/reccers don't believe in spoilers. For example, I'll never include spoiler information of any kind with one of my stories, but people who wanted that information could post it themselves over at Prosficspoilers and it could be found there.
What do you reckon? I can't believe no one's thought of it before! If people like the idea, then I could set up the comm with the appropriate settings, and then hand it over to anyone who volunteers to be a mod, and it'd be away - no muss, no fuss... *g*
no subject
And I volunteer to be the mod. ;-)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
spoiled *g*
Con - adds a little extra bother to the act of posting a story (you have to post the story and the spoilers/warnings separately, and then create a link between the two?) and - for those who want to - to the act of checking up on a story before reading it (though not much, in this case - it would just be a click away, iiuc? Or would you click through to the new comm and then have to search for the specific fic within it, which would be a bit further to go)
agh, re-posted because I keep screwing up!
Re: spoiled *g*
Re: spoiled *g*
Re: spoiled *g*
no subject
And I think I have to play a bit with the possibilities/limitations of a comm at LJ before I can say anything about it... :-o
(no subject)
no subject
It could be part of the routine for the Reading Room that a post goes on to that comm about a fic when it is first mentioned.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I agree with you that prosficspoilers shouldn't be for reviews, it should only be for spoilers ... letting people know about any warnings there might be, but without giving the story and/or details away. In-depth reviews and discussions should stay at CI5hq.
(no subject)
no subject
I like the idea, though I think you'd probably have to get it up and running to see if it works, if that makes sense *g*
As long as it was easy and simple to use for both readers and writers, I can only see it doing good - it would take the worry away from authors that they're going to under-warn or over-spoil, and readers wouldn't have to risk being spoiled inadvertently. Sounds like all round win *g*
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
http://firlefanzine.livejournal.com/11339.html
How about that? :-)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)