I think this writer could write about almost anything - Bodie or Doyle waiting for a bus - and I'd love it because I love the way she writes, perhaps even more than what she actually writes *about*.
*g*
An air of expectancy hangs over her writing, of hope against hope, a kind of breathlessness with the promise of things to come - that something wonderful (or terrible) is about to happen (even when it doesn't).
Yes. I was terrified to read Absolution. And because I was lending Justacat a hand, I couldn't read ahead. *g* I HAD to read it as it naturally unfolded.
Yes, at times she can write in a flowery kind of way but it doesn’t seem to irritate me in the way that M Fae Glasgow does. I never find Angelfish’s writing tortuous, long-winded or feel that she’s guilty of saying the same thing several times in different ways (like me), if she does then it just passes over my head.
Well, she's not showing off...flexing writing muscles just to flex them. She's lost in the words and the magic of the world she's creating. I find that very appealing in a writer. I think that's why her work is so emotional.
no subject
*g*
An air of expectancy hangs over her writing, of hope against hope, a kind of breathlessness with the promise of things to come - that something wonderful (or terrible) is about to happen (even when it doesn't).
Yes. I was terrified to read Absolution. And because I was lending Justacat a hand, I couldn't read ahead. *g* I HAD to read it as it naturally unfolded.
Yes, at times she can write in a flowery kind of way but it doesn’t seem to irritate me in the way that M Fae Glasgow does. I never find Angelfish’s writing tortuous, long-winded or feel that she’s guilty of saying the same thing several times in different ways (like me), if she does then it just passes over my head.
Well, she's not showing off...flexing writing muscles just to flex them. She's lost in the words and the magic of the world she's creating. I find that very appealing in a writer. I think that's why her work is so emotional.